group: Dani, Hattie, Hannah & Sam
Task 1:
The participant ran with shoes on to begin with. Here we identified that the runner was a rear foot striker (RFS). Their body angles were as follows:
Ankle - 74
Knee - 175
Hip - 140
Task 2:
The participant then repeated this task with bare feet. Here we identified that the runner became a mid foot striker (MFS). Their body angles were as follows:
Ankle - 93
Knee - 147
Hip - 141
The straightness of the leg with the shoe results in a heavy impact due to the shock running through the hip, knee and ankle. Although the show reduces this it does not eliminate it completely. The angles show a similar hip angle but different knee and ankle angles. This results in more flexion of the knee in the bare foot running. This causes the stretch shortening cycle of the leg and foot arc creating elastic recoil and power. To create a MFS, the leg is whipped forwards to to prevent heel pain on impact. However, this type of running requires a strong calf and achilles tendon to be effective.
Task 3 & 4:
In order to give some indication to how effective shod running is compared with bare foot, the participant ran around a hall for a minute whilst another participant counts their foot strike. They were filmed to identify their foot strike positioning too. Some attempts were ran using a metronome to 180 bpm, with and without shoes. Results are shown below:
Attempt 1: metronome not used - shoes on - 182 SPM - RFS
Attempt 2: metronome used - shoes on - 170 SPM - RFS
Attempt 3: metronome not used - no shoes - 172 SPM - MFS
Attempt 4: metronome used - no shoes - 186 SPM - MFS
When the participant had their shoes on he took more steps with no metronome, but fewer with the metronome suggesting they increased their stride length to keep up with the pace of the metronome. With no shoes their striking pace increased more significantly perhaps due to the stretch shortening cycle effect produced in the leg and foot arc. All in all, this data is not enough to distinguish whether bare foot running or shod running is more effective.
Hannah Snowden - Biomechanics
Thursday, 22 October 2015
Sunday, 4 October 2015
how cricket bowlers get swing
In cricket you will hear the commentators saying that the
conditions are perfect for swing. This ‘swing’ they are talking about can be
normal swing or reverse swing. But not all bowlers can perform reverse swing.
The ball will need to be propelled above 80mph so it will be able to move in
the air.
Normal swing will mainly occur when fielding team have a new
ball. As the ball wears the aerodynamics of the ball will change and it will
hard to have a large amount of movement for the swing. But when the ball
becomes much older, around 40 overs it will begin to swing towards the ‘shiny’
side. This is known as reverse swing. This means that a normal in-swinging ball
will become an out-swinger and an out-swinging ball will become an in-swinger.
So, both side have turbulent flow, but the seam will cause the airflow to
separate earlier on one side of the ball.
As the ball becomes rougher, it will have different
characteristics when it moves in the air after during the bowing motion.
To get swing on a cricket ball, you have to have a ball that
is asymmetric. So you have a smooth side, a rough side. When the ball is angled
slightly like the ball in the figure the incoming airflow will go both sides of
the ball creating the ball to swing.
There will be laminar flow around the smooth side of the ball and will
separate from the ball quite early creating a wake at the tail of the ball
where it had come from. On the other side however, you have flow that starts
off laminar, until it reaches the seam of the ball then tripping it into a
turbulent flow sticking to the ball for longer and separate later from the
ball. Therefore it will swing in the direction the seam is pointing.
You can bowl the ball in exactly that same way and get
reverse swing on the ball. The only difference is that the smooth side has more
wear as it has been used for longer as each over goes past. Now the ball is
getting a turbulent flow on both sides of the ball. Now the smooth side has
become rougher it will have a turbulent flow traveling round the ball and it
will come off the ball fairly late. On the other side of the ball, the flow is
turbulent before it reaches the seam. The seam causes the turbulent boundary
layer to thicken. Because this is a thinker layer the flow of the air will leave
earlier, so the wake is nearing the middle of the ball. This causes resultant
force acting upon the ball making the ball swing towards the smooth side.
In some games of cricket the ball will swing more than in
other games. This is caused by the humidity over the pitch. If there is a high
level of humidity that is when the ball swings the most.
Monday, 28 September 2015
data from bowling session
Biomechanics bowling
data
Which ball travelled faster?
Ball 1 – 2.39 + 0.49 seconds
Ball 2 – 2.62 + 0.39 seconds
Which ball had the most momentum?
Ball 1 – 194.90 + 29.97 kgmts.sec
Ball 2 – 240.63 + 21.84 kgmts.sec
Did the largest ball always have the largest momentum?
Yes, because the standard deviations of the linear momentum
for the weight of the bowling balls were not overlapping therefore ball 2 (the
heavier ball), had the ligger momentum.
BALL TIMES - There is no significant difference between the
heavier and lighter ball in the time taken for the ball to hit the first pin (t(32)
= -2.771, p> 0.05).
LINEAR MOTION – there
was a significant difference between the linear momentum between ball 1 and
ball 2 (t(32) =-11.871, p< 0.05).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







